Digesting Data: The Social and Ideological Actions of Eating Well with Canada's Food Guide

Public Deposited
Resource Type
  • "Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide" (CFG), Canada’s official dietary guidelines, is designed to address high rates of obesity and diet-related chronic diseases in Canada. This dissertation reports on a qualitative study of the social and ideological actions that the CFG performs. The study draws on concepts from Rhetorical Genre Studies, Science and Technology Studies, and Multimodal Interactional Analysis, and applies them in the analysis of interviews with key informants involved with the latest revision of the CFG and registered dietitians (RDs) working with vulnerable populations, as well as in a rhetorical and multimodal analysis of the guidelines. The findings of the analyses suggest that the CFG relies heavily on the representations typically reserved for scientific evidence from nutrition science, which focus on nutrients rather than on food. In the context of the CFG, these typical scientific representations are used for non-scientific audiences or in non-scientific situations, that is, cease to be scientific and become scientistic. The scientistic representations create rhetorical complexities, such as layers of rhetorical action (rhetorical laminations), and contribute to multiple rhetorical failures of the CFG. The scientistic representations in the CFG and the rhetorical failures they produce influence how RDs conceptualize nutrition, and dominate, rather than facilitate, discussions about healthy eating. As a result, RDs develop new discursive activities whereby they have to rely on additional resources to translate the scientistic representations for people and apply the CFG to their lives. Overall, the study suggests that the CFG, instead of an enabling resource, serves as a limiting document: it limits who can make healthier food choices and how such choices can be made. The study indicates that the CFG, as a rhetorical failure, has not achieved its intended social and ideological goals, or, in other words, has written itself out of usefulness.

Thesis Degree Level
Thesis Degree Name
Thesis Degree Discipline
Rights Notes
  • Copyright © 2016 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner.
Date Created
  • 2016


In Collection: