One hundred and ten English-speaking children schooled in French were followed from kindergarten to Grade 2 (Mage: T1 = 5;6, T2 = 6;4, T3 = 6;11, T4 = 7;11). The findings provided strong support for the Home Literacy Model (Sénéchal & LeFevre, 2002) because in this sample the home language was independent of the language of instruction. The informal literacy environment at home predicted growth in English receptive vocabulary from kindergarten to Grade 1, whereas parent reports of the formal literacy environment in kindergarten predicted growth in children's English early literacy between kindergarten and Grade 1 and growth in English word reading during Grade 1. Furthermore, 76% of parents adjusted their formal literacy practices according to the reading performance of their child, in support of the presence of a responsive home literacy curriculum among middle-class parents.
The goal of the present intervention research was to test whether guided invented spelling would
facilitate entry into reading for at-risk kindergarten children. The 56 participating children had poor
phoneme awareness, and as such, were at risk of having difficulty acquiring reading skills. Children
were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: invented spelling, phoneme
segmentation, or storybook reading. All children participated in 16 small group sessions over eight
weeks. In addition, children in the three training conditions received letter-knowledge training and
worked on the same 40 stimulus words that were created from an array of 14 letters. The findings
were clear: on pretest, there were no differences between the three conditions on measures of early
literacy and vocabulary, but, after training, invented spelling children learned to read more words
than did the other children. As expected, the phoneme-segmentation and invented-spelling children
were better on phoneme awareness than were the storybook-reading children. Most interesting,
however, both the invented spelling and the phoneme-segmentation children performed similarly on
phoneme awareness suggesting that the differential effect on learning to read was not due to
phoneme awareness per se. As such, the findings support the view that invented spelling is an
exploratory process that involves the integration of phoneme and orthographic representations. With
guidance and developmentally appropriate feedback, invented spelling provides a milieu for children
to explore the relation between oral language and written symbols that can facilitate their entry in
reading.
Oral narrative skills are assumed to develop through parent-child interactive routines. One such
routine is shared reading. A causal link between shared reading and narrative knowledge,
however, has not been clearly established. The present research tested whether an 8-week
shared-reading intervention enhanced the fictional narrative skills of children entering formal
education. Dialogic reading, a shared reading activity that involves elaborative questioning
techniques, was used to engage children in oral interaction during reading and to emphasize
elements of story knowledge. Forty English-speaking five- and six-year-olds were assigned to
either the dialogic-reading or an alternative-treatment group. ANCOVA results found that the
dialogic-reading children’s post-test narratives were significantly better on structure and context
measures than those for the alternative-treatment children, but results differed for produced or
retold narratives. The dialogic-reading children also showed expressive vocabulary gains.
Overall, this study concretely determined that aspects of fictional narrative construction
knowledge can be learned from interactive book reading.